Clarity LIMS
Illumina Connected Software
Clarity LIMS v6.3 & Lablink v2.5
Clarity LIMS v6.3 & Lablink v2.5
  • Release Notes Clarity LIMS v6.3
    • Release Notes Clarity LIMS v6.3.1
    • Release Notes Clarity LIMS v6.3.0
  • Technical Overview
    • Technical Requirements
  • Installation
    • Installation Procedure
    • Guide to Secret Management
    • Install/Upgrade Secret Management for Integration Modules
    • Change the Clarity LIMS Hostname
    • Update Server Passwords and Database Connection Details
  • On-Premise Deployments
    • Pre-installation Requirements
      • Install a Purchased SSL/TLS Certificate
      • Configure Your HashiCorp Vault
    • On Premise to On Premise Upgrade Procedures
    • On Premise to On Premise In-place Upgrade Procedures
    • On Premise to Hosted Upgrade Procedures
    • Hosted to On Premise Upgrade Procedures
  • Administration
    • Database Cleanup Procedure
    • Backup and Restore Procedure
    • Receiving and Decrypting Cloud Backup Data
    • LDAP Integration
      • Using the LDAP Checker Tool
    • Illumina Connected Software Platform Integration
    • Clarity LIMS Log Files
    • Customize the Term Used for Projects
    • Enforcing Unique Sample Names Within a Project
    • Container Name Uniqueness
    • Configure Electronic Signatures
    • Creating Enrypted Passwords
    • Config Slicer Tool
      • Managing Configurations with Config Slicer
      • Upgrading a configuration package/manifest file for compatibility with Config Slicer v3.0.x
      • Config Slicer Use Cases
      • Troubleshooting Config Slicer
    • Audit Trail
      • Enabling, Validating and Disabling Audit Trail
    • System Settings
    • Automation Worker Nodes
      • Troubleshooting Automation Worker
  • Clarity LIMS v6.3 Reference Guide
    • Dashboards
      • Overview Dashboard
      • Projects Dashboard
    • Projects and Samples
      • Projects
      • Samples Accessioning
        • Sample List for Batch Import
        • Guidelines and Tips for Batch Sample Import
      • Assign and Process Samples
    • Lab View
      • Requeue and Rework Samples
      • Storing Sample Aliquots for Later Use
      • Modifying Completed Step Details
      • Alert Notifications
    • Configuration
      • Lab Work
        • Steps and Master Steps
          • Step Milestones
          • Derived Sample Naming Convention Tokens
        • Protocols
        • Workflows
      • Consumables
        • Reagents
          • Reagent Kit Lot Manifest for Batch Import
        • Controls
        • Instruments
        • Labels
        • Containers
      • Custom Fields
      • User Management
        • Manage User Access
        • User Roles
        • Configured Role-Based Permissions
        • User and Profile Page
      • Automations
        • Automation Trigger Configuration
        • Copy Custom Fields from Step Input to Output
        • Template Files Associated With Automations
    • Automated Quality Control
      • Configure a QC System
    • Search
      • Basic Search
      • Advanced Search
    • Genealogy View
    • System Performance
      • Queue Performance and Usability
      • Demultiplexing API Endpoint Performance
    • Terms and Definitions
  • LabLink v2.5 Reference Guide
    • Project
      • Email Notifications for Notes
    • Resource Materials & Contact Us
    • Users
    • Configuration
    • Publishing Files and Progress
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Performance and Usability
  • Performance Test Results

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Clarity LIMS v6.3 Reference Guide
  2. System Performance

Demultiplexing API Endpoint Performance

The demultiplexing API endpoint is an extension of the existing artifact endpoint. This endpoint demultiplexes artifacts recursively to all individual derived samples that they represent.

For more information, see the Clarity LIMS API documentation.

Performance and Usability

In the past, some may have experienced performance and usability issues when demultiplexing large data sets. Clarity LIMS now includes the demultiplexing API endpoint, resulting in performance enhancements that speed up demultiplexing and allow quicker interaction with the data.

While acknowledging that usability is subjective, the Clarity LIMS product and development teams have established usability ratings based on criteria that measure how lab scientists must wait before they can interact with a feature on the screen. These criteria also allow for the comparison of performance and usability across the various screens of Clarity LIMS.

In the following table:

  • Successful user interaction means that a feature can begin to be interacted with (ie, it can be selected, scrolled, moved, and so on).

  • Numbers are provided for guidance only, and differ depending on the RAM and CPU speed of the computer used to view the page.

Usability Rating
Criteria

Good

A successful user interaction (data load) in ~ 2 seconds

Reasonable

A successful user interaction (data load) in ~ 6 seconds

Acceptable

A successful user interaction (data load) in ~ 9 seconds

Degraded

A successful user interaction (data load) in ~ 20 seconds

Unusable

A subjective limit to usability

Performance Test Results

The following table shows how the usability rating changes as the number of samples in the pool undergoing demultiplexing increases.

Usability Rating
# Samples

Good

2200 - 2400

Reasonable

3400 - 3600

Acceptable

4600 - 5800

Degraded

7200 - 7400

PreviousQueue Performance and UsabilityNextTerms and Definitions

Last updated 9 months ago

Was this helpful?